[{"id": 145464, "created": "2020-08-07T14:54:41.697291", "project_id": 456, "task_id": 85206, "user_id": 580, "user_ip": null, "finish_time": "2020-08-07T15:04:32.526033", "timeout": null, "calibration": null, "external_uid": null, "media_url": null, "info": {"NGR": "SX 201;544", "Site": "CORNWALL;PELYNT;FIVE BARROW FIELD", "CollHist": "Lost\r\nHistory\r\nIn 1845 Mr Couch believed the object was then in the possession of Mr Box of East Looe.", "Contents": "(1) Palstave, unlooped.", "comments": "", "ArchiveEtc": "", "ContextType": "?", "BiblioSources": "(a) Couch (1845) 18 and App. VI, 33\r\n(b) Borlase (1872) 41, fig.\r\n(c) Macnamara (1973) 19-20\r\n(d) Pearce (1982) 536 N\u00b0 118\r\n\r\nNote to Stuart\r\nReference (a) is from the Report of the Royal Inst. of Cornwall (1845). This publication does not seem to be available in Oxford, but (c) reports that the \"celt\" is referred to by Couch in RRIC (1845) App.VI 33, and that the water-colour sketch of the celt, signed by Couch, but undated, must have been among those presented to the RIC Truro by Couch in 1844-45. RRIC (1845) 18. Ref (c) adds that Borlase (1872) did not publish Couch's sketch, but preferred to compare the bronze with a \"celt\" from Godolphin Mine.\r\nCould you check the RRIC volume for 1845, as I can't find it in Oxford. So have not been able to do the Biblio-cards for the two entries in the RRIC volume for 1845.", "Circumstances": "Ref (a) : A \"celt\" said to have been found in a Pelynt barrow, \"several years\" before 1845, is reported by (b) to be similar to the \"celt\" from Godolphin Mine, i.e. an unlooped palstave.", "FindAltSiteRel": ""}}, {"id": 147812, "created": "2020-09-12T01:01:13.739098", "project_id": 456, "task_id": 85206, "user_id": 658, "user_ip": null, "finish_time": "2020-09-12T01:13:38.471823", "timeout": null, "calibration": null, "external_uid": null, "media_url": null, "info": {"NGR": "SX 201 544", "Site": "Cornwall, Pelynt, Five Barrow Field", "CollHist": "Collection:\r\nLost.\r\n\r\nHistory:\r\nIn 1845 Mr. Couch believed the object was then in the possession of Mr. Box of East Looe.\r\n\r\nNote to Stuart:\r\n     Reference (a) is from the \"Report of the Royal Inst. of Cornwall\" (1845). This publication does not seem to be available in Oxford, but (c) reports that the \"celt\" is referred to by Couch in RRIC (1845) App. VI 33, and that the water-colour sketch of the celt, signed by Couch, but undated, must have been among those presented to the RIC Truro by Couch in 1844-45. RRIC (1845) 18. Ref. (c) adds that Borlase (1872) did not publish Couch's sketch, but preferred to compare the bronze with a \"celt\" from Godolphin Mine.\r\n     Could you check the RRIC volume for 1845, as I can't find it in Oxford. So have not been able to do the Biblio-cards for the two entries in the RRIC volume for 1845.  \r\n", "Contents": "(1) Palstave, unlooped.", "comments": "", "ArchiveEtc": "", "ContextType": "?", "BiblioSources": "(a) Couch (1845) 18 and App. VI, 33\r\n(b) Borlase (1872) 41, Fig.\r\n(c) Macnamara (1973) 19-20\r\n(d) Pearce (1982) 536 No. 118", "Circumstances": "Ref. (a): A \"celt\" said to have been found in a Pelynt barrow, \"several years\" before 1845, is reported  by (b) to be similar to the \"celt\" from Godolphin Mine, i.e. an unlooped palstave.", "FindAltSiteRel": ""}}]